On 11-Apr-2002 Jules Bean wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:38AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Yes, but I don't think I want implement this. We would need a 'stateful
>> cursor' again to distiguish between '{' pressed or not, and editing
>> probably would get a mess again. How should editing work when you want to
>> change a_i to a_{ij}?
>
> No you don't. If '{' is not pressed, the cursor is in a 'single char
> subscript'. If '{' is pressed, the cursor is in a full blown box math
> (inset). So the cursor's state is expressed by where it is?
Yes but he's still right how would you "edit" when in single mode? We would
have to introduce a lot of code just for this case as you cannot simply add
a box before the i and where are you supposed to press '{' in that case?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Magic is always the best solution -- especially reliable magic.
