Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> int const xoffset_l = max(0, params.bb.xl - xl_orig);
>> int const xoffset_r = max(0, image_->w - params.bb.xr + xl_orig);
>> int const yoffset_t = max(0, image_->h - params.bb.yt + yb_orig);
>> int const yoffset_b = max(0, params.bb.yb - yb_orig);
>> looks a lot better...
>
>
| must be:
>
| int const xoffset_l = max(0, (int)params.bb.xl - xl_orig);
| int const xoffset_r = max(0, image_->w - (int)params.bb.xr + xl_orig);
| int const yoffset_t = max(0, image_->h - (int)params.bb.yt + yb_orig);
| int const yoffset_b = max(0, (int)params.bb.yb - yb_orig);
>
| or is there a better way?
I do not see why the cast is needed.
How do these conversions go... u_ing - int -> int? u_int?
it is very likely that the "0", needs a type modifier.
--
Lgb
