On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:37:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Which compiler that we support does not have a sufficient > Andre> std::string? > > There are bugs in compaq cxx 6.2 with std::string (an extraneous > assert), but I think it is fixed in 6.3 (cannot upgrade, though).
Well, is it is a reaely used function we could try not to use it... > Also lyxstring means much faster compiling and less disk footprint. I > tought you were interested in these kind of reasons. Oh... I am... But on bad days I lean to the Lars side of the world. Not that I am too proud of it [I won't be here tomorrow, so it's sort of Friday...] Getting rid of code is another of my nobler goals ;-} > Andre> Why the hack is it in such a state? I seem to remember making > Andre> 'cleaning up patches' at least twice... > > I think what you sent has been applied. Hm. Could well be. It was largish, and maybe I sent just part of it... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
