On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:48:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:01:01PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> How is this supposed to work? \mathcicumflex is not a macro known
>> to LaTeX as far as I know?
>
> See lyx_sty.C lines 125-127 and LaTeXFeatures.C lines 300-301.
>> For how long has this lyx_sty.C been there?
>> Has this been working at any time (espcially the 'boldmath' part?)
I don't know about boldmath. mathcircumflex was checked in a month ago.
It worked all the time in my tree, until I discovered yesterday (a propos
a merge conflict due to your changing the predefined macros syntax) that
the macro itself in math_macrotable had never made it to CVS.
So, yes, it works (well) in my tree, and no, it cannot have worked for
anybody else, except perhaps Angus (Angus?). I remember seeing one
error report on this on the list.
At this point you could consider removing ^ from the Misc sub-panel,
as it apparently has not received any broader testing. On the other
hand, the inability to have ^ as a symbol in math is IMO a regression.
It used to be possible. And this one works.
Your call.
> Andre'
Martin
msg35772/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
