Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:28:10AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Can you please give an example for the brain dead amongst us ?
>>
>> class Foo {
>> // unsafe variant
>> Foo()
>> : bar1(new Bar), bar2(new Bar)
>> {}
>> // safer variant
>> Foo() {
>> bar1 = new Bar;
>> bar2 = new Bar;
>> }
>> private:
>> Bar * bar1;
>> Bar * bar2;
>> };
>
| Bad example. No class should contain more than one raw 'owned' pointer
| is a better rule...
And _way_ harder to enforce..., and also please explain why this is a
bad example? And why shouldn't a class contain more than one pointer?
Does this one suid you better:
class Foo {
// unsafe
Foo()
: bar(new Bar), str(10, 'n')
{}
// safeer
Foo()
: str(10, 'n')
{
bar = new Bar;
}
private:
Bar * bar;
string str;
};
Now the str allocation throws.
--
Lgb
