On 15-Mar-2002 John Levon wrote:
> Um, we've seen several obscure bugs due to doing this inside insettext,
> just in the 1.2.0 era. Now insettext isn't exactly the simplest
> of insets, but maybe that's the point ...
Did you ask yourself why we have this problems? IMO we have the problems
because we never did this till the end. The "backlink" pointer HAS to be
givven to the "constructor" and this is not done for the InsetText. So
the owners here are responsible to set themself as owners and somethimes
this has been forgotten. Now if we would force to give it with the
"constructor" we won't have this problems. But right now this is on the
1.3.0 list of things to do!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Weinberg's Second Law:
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs,
then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.
