On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Maybe that tool is written in APL or Cobol, and maybe it's a result of a
> thousands monkeys typing in a cage. That is not important if the tool
> works.
You got the point ;-)
It does work only for a part of the kind of math LyX. Try \sqrt[3]{2} for
starters. Or most of the AMS environments.
And I certainly won't start 'fixing' an external tool.
> However, using eqascii would be a monotoneous improvement, and just
> because you can think of an even better improvement should not stop you
> from picking the lower hanging fruit.
I see it as 100 lines of wasted code and an additional external
dependencies.
> That said, I don't feel strongly about this or that feature. It's
> just a suggestion for what I thought was low hanging fruit.
I certainly appreciate your consideration, it's just that I see no
sufficient benefit in using 'eqascii'. Not that I don't like it, it is just
not doing all I want.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
