On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Herbert Voss wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > To express things differently, I am not sure that showing everything > > wysiwyg is a panacea. For example, I would hate to see equation > > > numbers in mathed showed as just numbers instead of labels. But may is > > it just because I am used to give meaningful names to my labels. > > > we are talking about citations and natbib.
The analogy is still valid though. > > And for citations, seeing [1] in the lyx window instead of [Key] is > > certainly not a plus, forgetting for now that I do not get anything. > > did I ever said, that you'll see [1] as label?? I suppose that > you don't tried the patch but give arguments against ... He sent a screen shot didn't he? > we are talking about natbib and not the plain version > of an bst-file. What about non-natbib, regular old numbered citations like JMarc and I use? I haven't tested your patch but if JMarc is able to provide screenshots which don't show anything useful for a citation then I'm also going to be annoyed. I certainly don't want a [1]. I'd much rather have a [Key]. Will you answer this challenge then if I ask it instead of JMarc? What do you get if you turn off natbib? What do the citations appear as? I've just spent half the day catching up on 500 emails from the last two days and gotten to this conversation last so please excuse my lack of time to test your patch today -- I've only just finished absorbing most of the major changes in CVS. Allan. (ARRae)
