On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:36:47PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I won't have time to look at this before next week. It is however
> related to the iterator usage in that function (as reported in
> Michael's Purify report). We have a vector iterator, erase what that
> iterator pointed at and then expect it to point to the next item in
> the vector after the erase. I don't think this is always valid so it
True.
> should probably just need something like:
> iterator temp = iter->next();
> iter->erase();
> iter = temp;
> Maybe. Maybe I need to reread how vector iterators are supposed to
> work?
This is not valid either.
A valid code is:
int i = iter - vec.begin();
iter->erase();
iter = vec.begin() + i;
