On 07-Jan-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Pointer * pointer;
> ...
> if (!pointer) {
> pointer = new Pointer;
> }
>
> will always have problems.
I don't get what you mean here (especially in the contents we are talking
about), but as I told you I don't argue that all class variables should be
initialized I just say that if I would have done this with the variables in
cause I would not have discovered the hidden bug Michael pointed me too. So
my argument was that maybe it's sometimes better to not initialize them if
we know that the should be initialized before we use them.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Cole's Law:
Thinly sliced cabbage.
