On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:41:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> A better arguement for letting this bug slip through might be that it
> also exists in most forms within 1.1.6. But I would argue that is
> even more reason why we should fix it before 1.2.0 (not necessarily
> before 1.2.0pre1).
agreed !
> patch. John, you were close but I ended up with a very different
> implementation to what you did.
>
> BTW, the unbreakable prepend magic is:
> @@ -0,0 +1,x @@
great. I'm glad this got done without me having to look at diff's source again ;)
regards
john
--
"We're standing there pounding a dead parrot on the counter, and the management
response is to frantically swap in new counters to see if that fixes the
problem."
- Peter Gutmann
