On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:07:33PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Very nice banner, may I use it when I eventually get around to
> updating my site? http://www.elec.uq.edu.au/~rae/LyX/
sure.
I also have a picture of our lyx animal thing to replace the ant ...
does he have a name ? he looks like a Steve to me !
> I like the quips -- I mean it. BTW, how do you fix a misspelled
> addition once it's added? Maybe a spell check on the addition and
> better yet some security to stop people using our site to slander
> others would be handy. At least a log of who added which lines
> anyway.
mozilla doesn't really have problem with that, and it has thousands
of additions.
> Yes. I might actually be inclinded to use this one. Although a
a big improvement on sf for sure.
> It'd be nicer if the choices for Priority were words rather than
> levels. I don't know if P5 is higher priority that P1 or vice versa.
> Sure, I could look at the bug_status.html page but why make it less
> obvious than it could to be? (I've forgotten which order it was
> already... now what was my name again? ummm... goldfish?)
I don't think we should use the P things anyway - the severity field
is good enough.
> We could use a few more Components in the choice. I image those that
> are there are from some of the bugs you have already added. Maybe
> more general areas like: import, export, menus, dialogs, convertors
> should be used rather than (or perhaps in addition to) source/class
> keywords.
yes.
> Version 1.2.0 hasn't shipped yet. That should probably be 1.2.0cvs
> instead. The generic "cvs" entry could then be removed. Doing this
> would give a long term bug a little more history -- we'd know which
> version it was first seen in.
I'd also like tags so I can say a bug is in 1.1.6 AND 1.2.0cvs or whatever
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels."
- Jonathan S. Shapiro
