On 05-Dec-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
> The insets allocated memory is at the same place isn't it? Wouldn't a
> signal connection be sufficient? Or a table of waiting-insets and the
> process they are waiting for a (UNIX) signal from?
The signal stuff would be a good way to eliminate the use of a owner_
pointer. If a child changes it just has to signal it to it's owner.
I find this a good and easy enough solution ;)
> Allan. (ARRae) I love stacks.
Well I really cannot follow all your cursor and stack and the lot discussion,
it seems very complicated only from reading your mail. But I'm sure when you
implemted it it will be quite easy to handle thereafter ;)
Anyway I love "other" things much more then stacks #:O)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
I'm a Lisp variable -- bind me!
