On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 03:57:34PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > preferred. Like this one instead of above?
> >
> > if (any length a && any length b && any length c) {
> > }
>
> If it fits on a line, it should be ok. But then, why don't you put the test
> in some function with some meaningful name and write
>
> if (someFancyConditionFulfilled()) {
> }
Because by "any length" I also meant really simple stuff like for
example:
if (p
&& !p->empty()) {
}
Although that is probably the extreme of simple examples.
Allan. (ARRae)
