On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > If we don't want a hackish solution (like the one that was in 1.1.6),
Me, myself and I don't want that. > then we need to add new return codes, e.g. UNDISPATCHED_FINISHED_RIGHT > which means that the inset should be unlocked, and the action should be > handled outside the inset. I agree that this would be a proper solution for a nice "work flow". Try to convince Somebody. Andre' -- André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
