Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:01AM +0200, ben wrote: > > > > > I think that we can start integrating the config phase of db2lyx with lyx. > > > > > > [...] > > Ok. I hope it's not too hard to do that. > > Not too hard. But boring sometimes. :-)
I understand. > > > How does it goes the transition to 1.2.0? > > > > I'm still fighting with the CVS current release. I have compilation problems > > (that I sent in another mail). I'm a bit frustrated by that... > > Have you been able to recompile using Angus tip's? Yes it works fine. My problem now is that there are troubles with the layouts. First, a general question: it seems that the raw style (that used to be LaTeX style) for a whole paragraph is removed. Does it mean that every raw text should be written in the inlined ERTs? I found quite practical to be able to write easily raw paragraph... Specifically with the DocBook layouts when I create a new DocBook file I have the error: LyX: Unknown tag `Latex' [around line 18 of file layouts/db_lyxmacros.inc] LyX: Unknown layout tag `Latex' [around line 19 of file layouts/db_lyxmacros.inc] Error parsing style `Code' LyX: Error reading inputfile: layouts/db_lyxmacros.inc [around line 43 of file ~/.lyx/layouts/db_stdclass.inc] LyX: Error reading inputfile: layouts/db_stdclass.inc [around line 8 of file ~/.lyx/layouts/docbook-book.layout] Error reading 'layouts/docbook-book.layout' (Check `docbook-book') Check your installation and try Options/Reconfigure... Beside this, I've looked at the diveinpython doc. The XML support seems quite interesting indeed! And the doc seems quite good. The doc is written in XML, and the PDF is quite good. Their process is to translate into HTML and then use htmldoc... Interesting. > PS: I was too quiet last week since I has finishing my work's report to > Scout's Wood Badge. I have succeeded. :-) > > See the initial part of http://www.pinetreeweb.com/woodbadg.htm to see what > it is this all about. ;-) Oh! Good! Scouts are everywhere ;-) I was quiet too, since I'm currently busy about something else, but I hope I could look at the 1.2.0 format compliance soon. > -- > José BG
