On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 09:49:14AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> AC_FIND_FILE(libqt.so.2.2.3 libqt.so.2.2 libqt.so.2 libqt2.so libqt.a libqt.sl,
> ^^^^^ ^^^ ^^
>
> Do you need to be that specific on the Qt2 version, tesing 2.2.3, 2.2 etc. ?
> If libqt.so.x.x.x exists, it will always be soft-linked to libqt.so (for -lqt)
> or libqt2.so (for -lqt2), won't it?
most systems don't mis-use the name of the library like that.
this is from older code, and is intended to prefer a 2.2 to a 1.x version. It's a bit
crummy, but the whole script is.
> Will upgrading to Qt3 cause trouble for LyX/qt2 ?
I have no idea.
regards
john
--
" It is quite humbling to realize that the storage occupied by the longest line
from a typical Usenet posting is sufficient to provide a state space so vast
that all the computation power in the world can not conquer it."
- Dave Wallace
