On Friday 07 September 2001 17:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> - Minibuffer message is duplicated: "LaTeX run number 2
> Angus> (message LaTeX run number 2)"
>
> Angus> This occurs because we try and post the LFUN name of each
> Angus> action to the minibuffer too. Useful if you want to learn how
> Angus> to perform am action using "M-x lfun_name xyz" Try M-x message
> Angus> Michael
>
> Angus> As this doesn't make any sense for LFUN_MESSAGE, I could patch
> Angus> the code.
>
> Angus> First, though, I want some feedback from someone who knows this
> Angus> code!
>
> Rather than that, I'd rather have an optional argument to dispatch (or
> another version of dispatch) that does not do this minibuffer thing. A
> bit like emacs knows whether a function has been invoked interactively
> or not.
>
> Alternatively, this message could be output explicitely in the places
> where we want it, i.e. in menu, toolbar and keybinding code.
Makes sense, but this is a big change and we're trying to avoid those at the
moment.
So, the question goes, shall I apply this band aid or shall I leave the bug
as a WONT FIX?
Angus
