On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:07:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Use it as usual. I haven't tried it but I'd guess they can be read in
> > properly. The only drawback is that you'll loose the optical feed back
> > in
> > But _LyX_ never _supported_ passing things like & and \\ to macros.
>
> Try the attached example.lyx
> It works on 1.1.6, but not in 1.2.0cvs
Ok, this is read and written now by 1.2.0cvs. It does, however, not show up
as part of the eqnarray (yet).
> > Probably not. But I want it to move in this direction.
>
> I don't.
> The best solution is to let the user choose which behavior he wants.
> I suggest you do this in 1.3.0, and for 1.2.0, revert to the old behavior
> ({ gives \{ and \{ gives {).
That's inconsistent with things like \$ or \#.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz ............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
