On 02-Aug-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> So what should I do if I have an \mathwhatever _in_ an \mathbf inset
> (or is this not possible at all?) and toggle bold. I.e:
>
> \mathbf{sss\mathwhatever{aaa|aaa}sss} (| is the cursor)
[snip]
Hmm that's the problem of having font changes as insets. But you probably
have to do it like this. I don't know how math works for latex isn't there
a posibility instead of putting there a \mathbf to put there a
\mbox{\textbf{aaa}} and so you can have "normal" text with all it's
text-properties? Well maybe I'm just talking crap!
> The "Insets have font attributes" solution starts to look nice...
No IMO if you have a Inset for boldtext you should have another inset for
non-bold-text, but all of this is quite complicted if you do fontchanges,
so I'm clueless. We don't need font informations for normal insets as we
get all we need as I explained in my former email.
But if this seems the easiest solution for your "internal" insets, which
effectively aren't "real" insets, as you told me, then I would say do it.
I still would think that the \mbox{} variant would be best, but probably
we have to ask our TeXpert's.
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Q: Why was Stonehenge abandoned?
A: It wasn't IBM compatible.
