Re: CVS Update: lyx-devel

[Andre Poenitz]

> Yes and no. the bv->text version is there where we "should" need only the
> outermost LyXText. This means the function should not be dependant of
> theLockingInset()! Maybe I missed some spots where I didn't understand
> really what the function does. So it does not mean "will not work in a
> text inset", but "should not consider theLockingInset()".

In which case does an inset need information about some more or less random
inset "above" it?

For someone looking from a larger distance,  bv->text looks as suspicious
as the dreaded current_view.

Andre'

-- 
André Pönitz ............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]