Re: super/subscript insets

[Dekel Tsur]

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:53:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> 
> I have thought about the proper handling of super- and subscripts and came
> more or less to the conlusion that some kind of base has to be part of
> the inset.
> 
> Three reasons for that:
> 
> 1. I am not aware of too many situations where there is a *script on its
> own in a formula (one might argue with "prepended" scripts, but that's
> solvable).

We do use that for faking text superscript/subscript
(insert->special-char->subscript)