Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 06-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > - using code that are written to be used in C++ (and not something
| > that I have hacked together to fit in C++ paradigms)
| > - using code that is in active use, has further developent and testing
|
| But if stuff in there (boost) is problematic and we REALLY don't need it
| to survive then we should leave it out till it is fixed, or do you really
| want loose valuable developers just because some "cramp" we use, but really
| don't have too. You put in this stuff and it's good to try it out, but we
| should be able to step back if we see that it produces too much problems!
Sure, but my first option when encountering these kind of problems is
not to revert to the previous version. I only do that after trying to
fix it.
--
Lgb
