Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 
| Lars> No but we should perhaps create one...
| 
| And what would that be exactly? More to the point, what is the problem
| with subclassing insettext? Just that you feel it is not right? I do
| not see speed or memeory problems happen due to this. And code reuse
| would be very high :)

yes, but code reuse would bo in wrong direction:

complex->simple

instead of maing a simpler inset that insetext could build on:

simple->complex

the inset you are speaking of have no need f.ex. for the
multiparagraph support in InsetText.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to