On Monday 28 May 2001 16:24, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | What is the status with the natbib branch ?
> | If it is not finished, then it probably requires only little work.
> | (I really don't know why we have a natbib branch and we don't have a
mathed
> | branch).
> | I wish to see it merged soon (before 1.2.0).
>
> But if it is not donw well I don't want it in LyX yet.
> f.ex. the pretty-ref stuff went in way to fast...
> And we have no only crude half-baked support for pretty-ref
> (to use it properly you have to hack in the preamble)
The natbib branch hasn't been touched since before I started the
controller/view split of the GUI back in February!
Whilst it was easy to implement the basic /citeX stuff two issues remain.
* Support for text before and after the citation in a clean way will require
a re-writing of the InsetCommandParams struct.
* disabling/enabling natbib through the Document dialog is really clunky.
All this is documented in the list threads
Re: lyx, natbib and alternate \cite commands
Re: Problem with Citation dialog
I'm really busy at work at the moment and don't really have much spare time
to sort this stuff out. I'll see if I can at least update the branch to
reflect current cvs.
Angus
