Am 20.04.2024 um 14:59 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller <jspi...@gmail.com>: > > Am Freitag, dem 19.04.2024 um 17:24 +0200 schrieb jspi...@gmail.com: >> Am Freitag, dem 19.04.2024 um 17:11 +0200 schrieb jspi...@gmail.com: >>> I am currently traveling, so I cannot test. But does the attached >>> patch help and provide a sufficient clues? >> >> Take this. The first one didn't link. > > I had a closer look and committed a better solution to master > (b8ff824a4f4ab4). This one checks for possible causes of the invalid > packages.lst format and tries to solve it, informing the user about > what has been done.
Looks good. > Riki, although this introduces some new strings, I would advise to put > this to 2.4.0. This is something that could bite users on upgrade, and > it makes LyX unusable and is pretty hard to diagnose on your own. So an > untranslated warning here is probably better that no warning at all. Yes. +1. Stephan > > -- > Jürgen > -- > lyx-devel mailing list > lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
