No problem concerning waiting for the next version. However I am heavily working on a long term paper right now, and by choice I decided not to update LyX until I am done with it (I am still using version 2.3.7 – I have tried the beta of 2.4.0 in the past, but I cannot install it right now). So, long story short, I cannot update the module's format at the moment. If someone is able update it for me and post it to this mailing list I will be very thankful. The hereapplies LaTeX package is part of CTAN and shipped with most GNU/Linux distributions, so it should not be difficult to test the module. I will also have a look at the file, and as soon as I am ready I will test it with the new version of LyX.
--madmurphy On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 1:36 AM Richard Kimberly Heck <rikih...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/23/23 12:33, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Dienstag, dem 21.11.2023 um 21:36 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > > Heck: > >> On 11/19/23 05:56, madmurphy wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> First of all congratulations for the good work! Any chances the > >>> hereapplies module* will be included with this release? > >>> > >>> * https://github.com/madmurphy/hereapplies.sty/tree/main/lyx-module > >> Could you explain what this does? > >> > >> Also, the module would need updating to most recent format. (You can > >> just use the layout2layout.py script to do that.) Also, it seems that > >> the two inset types are each defined twice. > > I don't want to spoil the party, but doesn't this break the string > > freeze? > > Sorry, yes, it would. My mistake. > > The module could be included for 2.4.1, though, using that backporting > stuff that Enrico did. So let's target that. @madmurphy, can you create > an enhancement bug for this, and target it to 2.4.1? > > Riki > > > -- > lyx-devel mailing list > lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel >
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
