On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 06:12:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 14/10/2023 à 18:09, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > > As a GNOME user I am quite used to this sort of UI (the search bar in > > the shell follows a similar spirit and is great for keyboard > > aficionados). > > Right. I miss the application menus there, though. > > > I suspect it is not easy to implement this properly, though. And I > > suspect it will trigger once more the critique that we go again our own > > UI path instead of duplicating what popular text processors do. > > Many environments do that. I wonder if there are hooks to feed the OS > version of the tool. > > > BTW this "HUD" will only show actions that are enabled in the given > > context, right (coming back to the issue that is at stake in this > > thread)? > > I guess it is our choice to make, but I'd say yes.
Here I would be more inclined to say that we should show the disabled items, since I think space is less of a concern. If the user searches "cancel", it would be user-friendly to show "cancel export (only enabled if an export is in progress)". Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
