On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 09:05:34PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Sat, 2023-08-19 at 12:40 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 05:05:36PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > > > The changes look simple so I would say go ahead for master branch. > > There is still no freeze for it anyway. > > > > Scott > > Could you do it, please?
Yes, in master at 65f8c080. > The ssh server from our server is old and I am unable to connect even > by enabling legacy mode. I tried this several times in the last two > years with the help of Riki and I have never succeeded. > > More and more other services have been increasing the requirements for > security and so the LyX server is the only where I have problems. :-( Ah I forgot about that. Sorry for the annoyance. > On a related note to this issue: > > 1) There is another batch of easy fixes that deal with the removal of > variables that are defined but never used. There are several examples > like this on the lyx2lyx directory. I guess the hard part is figuring out whether they are not used because of a typo? > 2) FWIW at some point, after the release of 2.4, I would like to > modernize the python code in order to remove the compatibility with > python 2. > > That compatibility is not only moot as it is a nuisance. One of the > easiest examples is the need that we have now to prefix all text > strings with u (for unicode). > > The same applies to use typing to annotate functions and take advantage > of static analysers to ensure the correctness of code. > > The questions is to decide what is the best timing for this operation. > Could it be after 2.4.1 release? I don't have a feeling for which is best. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
