Am Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:05:08 +0100
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>:

> Am Di., 1. März 2022 um 17:53 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>:
> Am Di., 1. März 2022 um 03:48 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier 
> <tcuvel...@lyx.org>:
> > I tested only for test.ltx, but I can reproduce the error at commit 
> > df59649a (before
> > any of my Unicode changes).
> >> 
> > Interestingly, I can't. With "make updatetests" in src/tex2lyx (which runs 
> > the
> > tex2lyx tests), I do not see changes at df59649a, and a new bisect again 
> > points at
> > 3f9e21b826926f.
> > 
> Nope, sorry: fec498d6617d (missed some bisect step)

OK, so it _is_ fec498d6617d.

> I have locally fixed the compile problem due to unsupported .contains() to 
> test also
> those commits.

That would have been my next step, if Thibaut does not react.

> Jürgen

OK, so it _is_ fec498d6617d.

        Kornel

-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Attachment: pgpYypT1_UmMh.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Reply via email to