On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:17:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 03/12/2021 à 17:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:46:13PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 31/10/2021 � 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a �crit�: > > > > See the attached file. On master, \normalsize is included inside the > > > > footnote, which is different from 2.3.x. > > > > > > Here is my take on how to properly fix this issue. I do not know however > > > what it does in other situations. Scott, do you have magic scripts and > > > tests > > > to see the effect of this? > > > > No magic scripts. All I do is manually compile the 2.3.0 user documents > > with 2.3.0 (or 2.3.x) and with master and then run 'diffpdf' on the > > results. I'm not sure it makes sense to test that the LaTeX is > > equivalent since often there are differences in LyX's LaTeX output that > > are expected that do not cause a difference in the PDF output. We could > > imagine some automated tests with e.g. 'comparepdf' (a commandline tool) > > that I think could check whether the PDF output are the same. We'd have > > to disable the date showing up. > > OK, I have done the main manuals, and found in UserGuide a place where a > greyedout note was inserted in bold context. This shows that a \normalfont > was missing in the lyxgreyedout definition, and the updated patch adds that.
I did some brief tests on other documents and it works fine from what I
can see. Small typo: "an non" -> "a non".
> What else could I try to be convinced that it works? Do we have font torture
> tests?
What would font torture tests do? Do you mean different font families,
or documents with things like \textbf{\textit{...{blah}}}?
We do have documents with lots of different languages (and thus
scripts). If this is what you're looking for, look at the files
autotests/export/latex/languages/supported-languages*.lyx
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
