On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:42:44PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:15:02 +0100 > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>: > > > Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 11:58 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > I see. I think I understand now. For the first column, the newline > > > insets are replaced with ERT, where as for the second and third > > > columns, > > > the new paragraphs are not replaced with ERT so the reversion routine > > > keeps being triggered. A potential solution would be to replace the > > > paragraph breaks with ERT so they would not trigger reversion > > > routines. > > > > Yes, but this solution would only please the tests and annoy normal > > users. > > > > Jürgen > > > > The reversions are important if peoples work with the same lyx-file but have > different > lyx-versions. (I pretend to see also these peoples as normal users) > Therefore the exchange is done through export. Not nice if, over the time, > the ERT's are > more and more polluting the document. > > The reason for these reversion tests was exactly this scenario. (Maybe not > sufficient, but > certainly better than nothing)
True. I personally agree with you that the convergence tests are useful. But I do not think the "cost" of keeping them is nothing. And I can understand if others find them more annoying than useful. I started a log at d3065cee here: development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt I'll try to update it from time to time. It won't be complete, but perhaps it can at least serve as a basis for future discussion and decisions. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
