On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:10:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dekel> So what do you want to do in 1.1.6fix2 ? Use my patch (for > Dekel> generating a clearer error message) or use a symbolic link ? > > Let's say we use your patch and try to devise a more sensible approach > for next 1.2.0 prerelease (so that people can test it out). I again have network problems, so please apply it yourself (I think it is probably a good idea to apply it also to HEAD, in case this issue is forgotten)
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (statu... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (s... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (s... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Juergen Vigna
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (status update #4) Dekel Tsur
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (status update... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (status up... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (statu... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix2? (s... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.6fix... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Real last call for 1.1.... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes