On 09-Apr-2001 John Levon wrote:
> Since the line is un-necessary, we could "fix" this by not doing it in the Clone()
> case. But of
> course that isn't a proper fix (and we have a duty to tell gcc if it's reproducable
> with current
> gcc CVS ...)
>
> I'm really stuck now at what to do, I have no idea ...
Well we could file a request to "gcc" and tell'em what's going on and if we
or they do anything wrong, couldn't we? (Well if they will not be busy with
something else and don't have the time to check this).
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
We all live under the same sky, but we don't all have the same horizon.
-- Dr. Konrad Adenauer
