On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 13:09, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 05:39:51 +0100 (CET) > schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <tcuvel...@lyx.org>: > > > commit d64b3f5397fd50d23bc04d7130f5f5b55d79d7b0 > > Author: Thibaut Cuvelier <tcuvel...@lyx.org> > > Date: Mon Nov 16 06:09:03 2020 +0100 > > > > DocBook: implement Elsevier. > > --- > > development/autotests/invertedTests | 6 +++ > > lib/layouts/aa.layout | 1 + > > lib/layouts/elsart.layout | 70 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > lib/layouts/elsarticle.layout | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > lib/layouts/theorems.inc | 2 +- > > 5 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Nice progress. > Now there are 24 failed tests left (out of 373). > OTOH, from the successful are 137 inverted. > > Are you planing to uninvert some of the inverted in the future? If so, you > could mark them > in suspendedTests too (that is: additionally to invertedTests). >
Usually, inverted tests are marked as such because of slight validation problems of the resulting DocBook file. However, fixing these issues would take a very long time and would mostly consist of adding a lot of code for just one layout… I am considering this for common cases (like layout arguments that could be converted to XML attributes or the positioning of acknowledgements), but not in the short term. I will mark them as suspended too next time! Mostly, the output is close to valid DocBook, and it could go through the usual publication chains and still yield some valid results (e.g., viable ePub).
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
