Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Oops, that, or something else, gave many "mulitiple definition of
> | std::string::blah blah
>
> hmm... so you suddenly see what I saw earlier.
>
> I really cannot see the cause for this.
> Do we have an include guard wrong?
> Is the stdc++-v3 lib having an include guard wrong?
>
> gcc 2.96 still works flawlessly.
>
> --
> Lgb
The problem only showed up in cvs in last two days, but is still there.
I can compile with 2.95.2
