On 11/2/20 2:33 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 02/11/2020 à 19:50, Yuriy Skalko a écrit :
I'll check this stuff. By the way, is it related to numbered layouts
that Daniel is now implementing on the bugtracker
(https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12010)? I don't inadvertently want
to break his results.
Yes it is related, but it should not break things in a painful way.
No, I wouldn't think so, either.
I have been thinking just a bit about this and wonder how plausible it
is to separate out those elements of the Counter class that are
per-Buffer (or, at least, document set) and those that are not.
Basically: ALL of the members of Counter are per-Buffer. The ones
associated with values obviously are. But so are e.g. labelstring_ and
prettyformat_, since these can be over-ridden by local layouts, modules,
etc. So I'm not sure there will be anything left if we factor out the
non-per-Buffer stuff.
Riki
Now I've done some profiling and is interested looking into
`updateMacros` that is one of the execution hotspots.
Yes, updateMacros is a pain, it is actually a O(n^2) algorithm which
kills performance for big documents. But it is a bit scary and I never
dared changing it :)
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
