On 10/13/20 1:52 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:40:51 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > Suggestion: Let's see if we can get people on different platforms and > > > with different compilers to try the patch. As has already been said, we > > > do occasionally run into cases where includes are needed sometimes but > > > not others. > > > > > > Me: Fedora 31, gcc 9.3.1, all is well. > > > > > > Riki > > > I will be picky :-) -- SCNR as a mathematician -- but the important > part is not the compiler but the standard lib used. > > > I had this epiphany because I had initially compiled with gcc 10.2.1 > in Fedora 33, it worked, and then I repeated the same procedure with > clang 11. > > > Before the compilation was over I knew that, excluding any compiler > bug, the result should be the same since in Fedora both gcc and clang > use libstdc++ (the GNU Standard C++ Library) in Fedora. The results > could differ with clang and libc++. > > > Since Yuriy is using apple's clang this is covered (at least for the > current libc++). > Probably could use a report on Windows, then. Or Yuriy could commit and see if anyone complains...
Riki
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
