Am Freitag, den 02.10.2020, 16:09 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 08:35:16AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2020, 17:21 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Starting with this commit, if a deactivated branch has a > > > reference to > > > a label that's in the same branch, > > > the reference is marked as "BROKEN". See attached. > > > > Actually, the ref _is_ "Broken" as the target label is in a non- > > outputting context. > > I guess I object to the definition of "Broken" then :)
Also if the ref is outside the branch? Then you get a dangling reference in the output. > > We can probably omit the mark if the ref is in the same non- > > outputting > > context (or generally if it is in a non-outputting context itself). > > This indeed corresponds to the behavior I was expecting. The problem is that I am not sure how to mark "real" broken refs in that case (e.g., to labels in notes or comments). Jürgen > > Scott
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
