Am Sat, 19 Sep 2020 22:16:05 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 10:01:19PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:33:56 +0200
> > schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>:
> >
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.4/include/g++-v4/streambuf:810:7:
> > > error:
> > > 'std::basic_streambuf<_CharT, _Traits>& std::basic_streambuf<_CharT,
> > > _Traits>::operator=(const std::basic_streambuf<_CharT, _Traits>&) [with
> > > _CharT =
> > > wchar_t; _Traits = std::char_traits<wchar_t>]' is private operator=(const
> > > basic_streambuf&) { return *this; }; ^ In file included from
> > > support/docstream.h:18:0, from output_latex.h:17, from Paragraph.cpp:37:
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.4/include/g++-v4/sstream:64:11: error:
> > > within
> > > this context class basic_stringbuf : public basic_streambuf<_CharT,
> > > _Traits>
> > > ^
> > >
> > > Pavel
> >
> > Should we really support this old gcc? I don't see this with gcc 8.4.
>
> Yes we really should. I was housekeeping the code for older gcc during the
> whole 2.4
> development cycle and dropping support for otherwise functional frameworks
> just ahead
> of new major release and thus to break the whole stable series for next 2+
> years
> is not wise. We should drop deps when it's too expensive and in the
> begining/middle
> of cycle.
>
> Pavel
You have a point.
Kornel
pgp1T099tAa3X.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
