Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 04-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > lyxstring is a hack. | | But a good and necessary hack, isn't it ;) but not for long... imo we should never choose lyxstring over a conforming std::string. lyxstring has certainly served its purpose, but its time is running out. -- Lgb
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Dekel Tsur
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Allan Rae
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Allan Rae
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Juergen Vigna
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen