On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:58:47PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 24.08.2020, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > Tend to think that it has too many assumptions (like naming > > conventions of the files) that it's generally unlikely to > > work out of the box for people. > > We could at least make usage more convenient. As for the naming > conventions: yes, that's true. Many of my ebooks do not have year but > title (since that's how calibre saves them by default, and it's also > less ambiguous). > > I think it would not be too hard to provide a settings to select which > two fields are being passed to the script (e.g., title and author > instead of year and author).
I saw that coming :) I am all fine with that, except I don't want to be the one who is commanded to implement it. All I ever needed was the lyxpaperview hack and I hope I paid my fair share by coding the basic framework which will allow other people to use normal bib(la)tex fields or easily extend the scripting part. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
