On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 23:03, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
Given the number and size I would appreciate if we could stick to few > technicalities, which > were little chaotic in the previous exchange and would become even worse > with larger thread. > - please try bottom post with your replies, leaving only relevant parts of > previous emails (e.g. questions you directly reply to). > - put your answer as a reply to an email where it was asked not to some > different subthread > - to reduce your burden, when we discuss patch X, you don't have to send > and rebase all patches X+1,X+2 and so on, just updating patch X in your > reply is enough. > I'll keep these in mind. (I'm not really used to mailing lists…) Is this answer better in these regards? > * 0001 is trivial, now in. I haven't seen any makefile entries, so these > autotests won't be distributed with tarballs. I do not know whether this is > what you want. > I didn't know that anything was required to get them in tarballs… As for the other tests, I guess it would not make sense not to include them. > * 0002 - you remove checkDocBook() call, yet the code of the function > remains. Is it still needed? > Basically, this function should be replaced by True, so it can be safely removed.
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
