On 5/4/20 1:47 PM, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > No, it's not necessary, but I felt it was needed to keep some > consistency in the code.
Seems reasonable. I've done that, too. Also fixed the missing include. Riki > > > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 19:45, Richard Kimberly Heck <rikih...@lyx.org > <mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>> wrote: > > On 5/4/20 12:05 AM, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > One of the largest changes is due to the addition of requires to the > > list of keywords, which is currently replaced by requirements, which > > is close in meaning. > > Most of these have been fixed, and I think I just fixed the rest. > > I don't see a clang warning here with requires_, which I do get for > requires by itself. Are you sure that's needed? > > Riki > >
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
