Am Thu, 20 Feb 2020 22:10:17 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>:
> Am 20.02.2020 um 19:24 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>:
> >
> > Am Thu, 20 Feb 2020 18:10:30 +0100
> > schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>:
> >
> >> Am 20.02.2020 um 17:37 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>:
> >>>
> >>> Am 20.02.2020 um 17:08 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>:
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 20.02.2020 um 16:49 schrieb Christopher Menzel
> >>>> <chris.men...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> while working with SyncTeX I came to the conclusion a standard
> >>>>>> key binding for "Navigate > Forward Search" would be very useful.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's certainly one of my most-used custom keybindings. I use emacs
> >>>>> bindings so
> >>>>> have mapped it to C-c-f. You obviously wouldn't want to hijack C-c if
> >>>>> you use CUA
> >>>>> bindings (and you use Windows or Linux rather than a Mac).
> >>>>>> I’d like to propose:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> \bind "C-S-F" "forward-search“
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As Scott pointed out, that is indeed the cua binding for advanced find;
> >>>>> from
> >>>>> cua.bind:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> \bind "C-S-f" "dialog-show findreplaceadv“'
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, indeed. I’ve used case sensitive grep to search for a free binding
> >>>> and missed
> >>>> it. :( The preferences and the menu present these with capital letters.
> >>>>
> >>>> So a better grep shows the free keys are: C-S-c and C-S-h.
> >>>
> >>> Also working and IMO sensible is: C-S-Right.
> >>
> >> But also not free :(
> >>
> >> I think this reveals a real problem. I’ve detected some other clashes
> >> introduced over time. E.g. in mac.bind
> >>
> >> \bind "M-C-Right" "depth-increment"
> >> \bind "C-M-Right" "tabular-feature move-column-right"
> >>
> >> I’ll see how to check for this with a script…
> >>
> >> Stephan
> >
> > Thanks for the idea. Script is ready.
> >
> > For mac, I get
> > $ bindCheck.pl mac
> > file = /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/lib/bind/mac.bind
> > clash for key C-M-Right in line 365
> > prev line(266) value(depth-increment)
> > new line(365) value(tabular-feature move-column-right)
> > clash for key C-M-Left in line 366
> > prev line(267) value(depth-decrement)
> > new line(366) value(tabular-feature move-column-left)
> > $ bindCheck.pl cua
> > clash for key S-F7 in line 216
> > prev line(120) value(thesaurus-entry)
> > new line(216) value(bookmark-save 7)
>
> :)
>
> Plus Escape?
>
> cua.bind:237:\bind "Escape" "cancel"
> mac.bind:362:\bind "Escape" "cancel"
> math.bind:139:\bind "Escape" „escape"
I tested only one file, not a combination.
> Ok, now I propose this for forward-search:
>
> \bind "C-S-colon"
> \bind "C-S-period" "forward-search"
>
> The duplication is intentional to make it work for different keyboard layouts.
> Is this duplication acceptable or is there some other technique to solve this?
>
> Stephan
>
Normally one would use
\bind "C-~S-colon" "forward-search"
if colon and period share the same key
Kornel
pgpmVqPPBI03L.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
