On 2019-08-30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. August 2019, 10:32:19 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> On 2019-08-29, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > Am Donnerstag, 29. August 2019, 12:19:41 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> >> On 2019-08-29, Kornel Benko wrote:

> ...

>> >> MonomakhUnicode comes with the Debian package "texlive-fonts-extra".

>> > We are talking about system fonts, don't we? texlive-fonts-extra is for
>> > tex only.

>> Yes. And this is why the font is not available outside "out of the box".
>> I have a copy in ~/.fonts which makes it available system wide for me.

> Could you describe the procedure on how to make a tex font available?
> Sorry for being dump.

I just treat it like any locally downloaded font: place in the "magic" folder
~/.fonts, that is all.

>> OTOH, it is a Unicode-encoded OpenType font and you most probably have it
>> already on your hard disk. The "unreliableTests" comment now also has a
>> public URL for download. It won't be easy to find "fonts that are more
>> commonly available".

> Could not find the correct comment

Not yet commited, sorry.


>> >> Also, the change from Serif Devanagari to Sans Devanagari violates the 
>> >> rule
>> >> >> * correct family/shape
>> >> This may be OK as last ressort, but generally the test documents should 
>> >> also
>> >> be examples of best current praxis. Both fonts are present in the
>> >> Debian/stable package "fonts-noto-hinted" (and yes, they look different).

>> > Installed here too, but without the Serif part.

>> Strange.
>> Here, I have "fonts-noto-hinted" version 20161116-1 from Debian/stable.
>> So either your version is older than


>>  fonts-noto (20160724-1) unstable; urgency=medium

> True, it is:
>       $dpkg -l fonts-noto-hinted
>       ii  fonts-noto-hinted            20160116-1          all                
>  "No Tofu" font families with large Unicode coverage (hinted)

>> ...
>>   * [ upstream ]
>> ...  
>>     + Add Serif Devanagari (h/uh) v1.01.

>> or a newer version excludes this font again for some reason.
>> (However, I can not find a hint to such a step in the Debian/unstable
>> changelog
>> https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/f/fonts-noto/fonts-noto_20181227-1_changelog
>> )

>> Alternatively, you can download from upstream (i.e. Google):
>> https://www.google.com/get/noto/ points me to
>> https://noto-website-2.storage.googleapis.com/pkgs/NotoSerifDevanagari-hinted.zip


>> IMO, the current policy is to allow such dependencies (cp. the various LaTeX
>> packages that are only available on the publishers homepages or the LyX wiki)
>> but mark them as "unreliable.nonstandard" rather than make sacrifices on our
>> testing.

>> The other side of the coin is that every tester may get some failures due to
>> unmet requirements and that whenever such a test fails it helps to look up
>> the additional requirements in "unreliableTests".


> Did you commit? Cannot find.

Done now.

have a nice weekend,
Günter


Reply via email to