On 2019-01-15, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2019 16:01:37 CET schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net>: >> On 2019-01-14, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2019 22:49:35 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak >> > <skost...@lyx.org>: ... >> >> 1/1 Test #6291: INVERTED.TODO_export/templates/acmart_pdf ...***Failed >> >> 4.27 sec ... >> It is in unreliableTests/varying_versions now. >> >> And on visual inspection, the ps2pdf output looks to be the same as the >> >> pdflatex output. Kornel, what do you get for this test? >> > 'diffpdf' finds differences in text (A.1, profit, first, specific), but >> > visually hard to see for a human. >> Small but important detail: Some exports missed the page number in the >> black square at page 1. Could you check this in the Postscript or ps2pdf >> export? >> Thanks, >> Günter > Yes, dvipdfm does not have the number. So yes, acmart requires pdflatex. I moved all "non-PDF latex" tests for acmart to unreliableTests/wrong_output. Thank you for looking, Günter
