On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> X-No-Archive: yes
> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Authentication-Warning: trylle.birdstep.com: larsbj set sender to lyx using -f
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: namespaces
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
> Organization: LyX Developer http://www.lyx.org/
> Date: 15 Mar 2001 19:20:52 +0100
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7
>
>
> I am now removing all CXX...NAMESPACES stuff (of course I should have
> let someone with an older compiler do this...), will commit that in a
> few minutes.
>
> What I now need is a poll to see if anonymous namespaces are supported
> on the different platforms.
>
>
> So people please test:
>
>
> namespace {
>
> int foo() { return 1; }
>
> }
>
> int main() {
> int i = foo();
> }
>
>
>
> And if you wonder why I want to know: The keyword "static" is
> deprecated when used at file scope. And the prefered way to do it is
> with anonymous namespaces.
>
> Lgb
Compiles clean, a.out runs clean, no messages printed whatsoever.
(Does that mean 'yes'?)
egcs-1.1.2-30, egcs-c++-1.1.2-30, libstdc++-2.9.0-30. Red Hat 6.2.
--
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helsinki University of Technology
Department of Surveying
P.O. Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland
:wq
