On 9/28/18 1:12 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 27.09.2018 um 19:56 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <rikih...@lyx.org>: >> On 09/23/2018 02:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Am Samstag, den 22.09.2018, 20:42 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt: >>>>>> What can be done with it? The error is serious and makes the >>>>>> tex2lyx in the original package useless. I propose to replace the >>>>>> wrong package with the new one. But is this an option? There is >>>>>> no visible difference between the two LyX versions. The About LyX >>>>>> info is not different, AFAICS. >>>>> We routinely do this for the Windows build, so I think it is ok. >>>>> But >>>>> maybe we should raise it on the list and see what people think? >>>>> JMarc >>>>> and Jürgen especially. >>>> Yes, we should. It did’t do it in the first place because of the >>>> download links - but now I think it doesn’t hurt. >>>> >>>> What do you think should be done here? >>> I think we should proceed and provide a new binary with a clear >>> distinctive sub-version number (2.3.1.1). And of course announce it >>> (for Mac only) so that Mac users know they should upgrade. >> I have uploaded these now and will wait 24 hours for mirrors to sync >> before making the >> annoucement and chaning the website. > Don’t we need a new version tag to get the 2.3.1.1 in the About LyX? > I should have ask earlier, I know - sorry.
I'm kind of ignorant of that sort of thing. Anyone? (I will hold off on any announcement.) Riki
