Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2018 17:50:00 CEST schrieb José Abílio Matos <jama...@lyx.org>: > > > [ 1139s] lyx.x86_64: W: non-executable-script > > /usr/share/lyx/scripts/prefTest.pl.in 644 /usr/bin/env perl > > [ 1139s] This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated > > for [ 1139s] executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be > > executed. If > > [ 1139s] the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable > > bits, [ 1139s] otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. > > [ 1139s] > > I could probably do the same for perl. Is there any objection? >
Quick look does not show a problem since we call perl executable explicitly
here.
I had (erroneously?) the impression, that the use of 'env' is a more portable
way.
So it is for me somehow surprising to see these warnings.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
